Dual Relationships in Counseling
Dual relationships and boundary crossings are perhaps the most frequent Georgia Composite Board license complaints. But this is often not immediately apparent.
To illustrate, the board can receive ten patient complaints that all appear very different and all could be determined to be dual relationships violations and boundary issues.
The fundamental challenges of patient/therapist interactions in psychotherapy are universal. Therefore, it follows that counselor boundaries are also common problems for many other state mental health professional licensing boards.
The Georgia board sometimes requires licensees to complete continuing education in boundaries as conditions for reinstatement or issuance of licenses.
Dual relationships are boundary crossings, but boundary crossings are not necessarily dual relationships. Let's discuss how they differ.
"Ethics: The Anatomy of a Boundary
Crossing and Dual Relationships
A Continuing Education Ethics Workshop for LPC, SW and MFT
Your Presenter: Eric Groh LPC CPCS NCGC II;
Former President; Composite Board of PC, SW and MFT's
Friday, July 26 2019
3 NBCC Hours
Is it a boundary crossing or dual relationship? It depends.
Learn now how to know the difference.
1) Participants will demonstrate knowledge of the differences between boundary crossings and boundary violations.
2) Participants will demonstrate knowledge of various manifestations of boundary violations which result in licensing board complaints and lawsuits from patients.
3) Participants will understand how a series of clinical decisions can result in a boundary crossing or licensing board complaint.
4) Participants will learn to understand the difference between ethical and unethical dual relationships.
Prior ethics workshops participants say...
"This workshop answered questions I've had about our industry for 20 years. I highly recommend this workshop to any professional counselor, marriage and family therapist, or clinical social worker."- Richard Blankenship
"I wish I had taken this workshop when I was initially licensed."- Tamara Ashley
"Eric Groh's ethics workshop was the best ethics CEU that I've attended."- Prominent Atlanta LPC.
"...the least torturous ethics I've attended."- Jaclyn DeVore
"Highly qualified and knowledgeable presenter."- Faith Arkel
About The Presenter
Eric has made formal judgements on over 200 licensing board complaints against Professional Counselors, Social Workers and Marriage and Family Therapists. Participants enjoy Eric's relaxed and lighthearted presentation of serious material and how this non-threatening approach paves the way for greater particpant understanding.
Eric specializes in dissociative disorders and addiction in his Atlanta private practice.
He has provided consulting services to state and federal agencies on Gambling Addiction and Hurricane Katrina Disaster Relief. He is founder and president of the non-profit Georgia Council on Problem Gambling.
Who Should Attend?
1) Anyone practicing psychotherapy in the state of Georgia including individuals licensed by the Composite Board and non-licensees who want to know whether they are practicing ethically and legally.
2) Licensees mandated by the board through informal action or public disciplinary action, consent orders or license suspensions.
3) Agency administrators and supervisors interested in learning how to structure their organization's policies to minimize problems related to dual relationships and boundary issues.
Boundary Violation or Dual Relationship?
Dual Relationships in Counseling
When we engage in psychotherapy with patients or clients, we have created a client/therapist relationship. When a client chooses us as their therapist, a power differential is created in which it becomes our responsibility to manage this relationship.
This power differential is created by:
1) clients' beliefs that we are experts because we have advanced education are knowledgeable in psychological matters and are licensed or sometimes doctors or PhD's. Remember: there is ALWAYS a power differential.
2) As a result of the above clients submit to vulnerability and are indeed vulnerable through this power relationship.
In short, a client /therapist relationship is characterized by an individual seeking mental and emotional help because we are believed to be expertly skilled in psychotherapy. Our singular role is to treat their mental distress through psychotherapy.
The relationship becomes dual when
1) we purchase an item they are selling because we want to assist them financially.
2) we become an advocate for an agenda in their personal life that is not related to helping them with psychotherapy. For example, assisting in finding employment (unless one is solely--solely-- a career counselor).
In both instances, the therapist has created two relationships. In the first example, they are therapist and customer of the client. In the second example, they are therapist and headhunter/job recruiter.
Therapy Boundary Crossing or Violation
An effective way to illustrate this is through a hypothetical example:
John receives a letter from the Composite Board asking that he address an allegation of patient abandonment. John's responds to the board with various details of his work with the patient and that he recently discovered she suffered with borderline personality disorder.
Let's work backwards and find the boundary crossing/ violation.
X has been a patient of John's for approximately two years. John admits to having limited experience with treating borderline personality disorder. He had felt uncomfortable working with the patient when he began treating her as he felt manipulated but did not want to abandon her.
He further stated in his response to the board that the patient expressed he was the only therapist who ever helped her and she was very persistent in continuing therapy with him. This was his justification to the board for continuing to treat her. John finally terminated therapy when the patient became upset and threatened a licensing board complaint after John finally convinced her he was not the best therapist for her. The board confirmed with John this was indeed the crux of the patient complaint.
Why is this a boundary violation?
1) If John had experience with borderline personality disorder, he would have had the expertise to identify borderline traits almost immediately after engaging her in therapy.
2) Remember: the responsibility of managing the therapeutic relationship rests squarely on the counselor. John's inexperience further resulted in his inability to assert himself with the client and draw a firm boundary. By not drawing a boundary, he crossed a boundary. It is very likely the complaint of abandonment would not have occurred had John referred this patient to another therapist two years earlier.
3) As a side note, John consulted with peers who all agreed (probably erroneously) that since the patient threatened a board complaint he was not obligated to provide referrals to other therapists. So likely a third mistake was made.
We all know in theory we should work within our area of expertise, but this is a great practical example of how a series of clinical decisions resulted in a boundary crossing and licensing board complaint. It is also easy to see how this scenario could result in the patient filing a malpractice suit against the therapist.
There are almost limitless examples of seemingly very different ethics scenarios which can all be found to be boundary issues and dual relationships.
Join me at the ethics CE workshop and I'll help with YOUR scenario. Bang. eric-